
Toptal Product Launch Plan
Research to Support Product Strategy, Marketing, and Sales
Project Overview
Objective | Identify key value propositions and messages for marketing and sales strategies to optimize the product landing page. |
---|---|
Strategy | MaxDiff (tradeoff analysis) survey to prioritze value propositions; interviews to understand customer needs, expectations, and test landing page. |
Stakeholders | Growth (Product and Design), Marketing, SEO/SEM, and Customer teams |
Duration | 5 weeks |
Outcomes | Refined value propositions and landing page; successfully launched Managed Delivery, resulting in significant contracts with both existing and new customers. |
Background
Toptal is a global network that connects companies with rigorously vetted freelance talent for their most critical projects in software development, design, finance, and more. This case study details my role in shaping the product vision and launch strategy for a brand new business model Toptal recently launched: Managed Delivery.
My Role: Lead Researcher and Strategy Collaborator
Objectives
Identify the most important value propositions and messages to highlight for marketing and sales strategies for maximum resonance with the target audience
Guide the product and service fulfillment strategy to ensure it meets customer expectations, targeting their most important needs and pain points
Evaluate the product landing page to identify optimizations
Research Strategy
For this product launch, we needed deep, qualitative data to guide our decisions, but we also wanted a high level of confidence in the data to avoid later rework. To achieve these goals, I took two main approaches: 1) a MaxDiff survey (tradeoff analysis) to assess which value propositions resonated most highly with the target audience, and 2) in-depth interviews to understand their past experiences with services like this, their expectations, and their pain points. In those interviews, I also showed two versions of a concept for the landing page to gauge their reactions.
I create research plan documents for each study I lead which allow for full transparency and collaboration throughout the process.
Focus 1: Customer Experiences and Needs
The Problem: Toptal knew there was a need in the market for Managed Delivery, because their customers had been asking for it from them for years. Toptal historically connected clients with top-tier talent and teams of talent, but the relationship ended there. With Managed Delivery, Toptal would not only provide the talent, but would manage and deliver the end-solution as well. They knew customers wanted this, but they didn’t know why they wanted it or their preferences for the service relationship.
Goal
My job was to bring clarity to the service model - to dig into why people were asking for this solution, what they would expect and need in a service like this, and what was missing or not working well with existing solutions.
Solution
To explore these questions, I conducted 6 in-depth interviews with leaders and executives who had experience contracting Managed Delivery-like services. This research discovered key pain points, needs, and expectations which were pivotal in crafting the perfect messaging and service playbook for Managed Delivery. It also identified several major messaging risks, such as the need to balance a white-glove service style with maintaining the customer’s sense of control - customers didn’t want to feel they had thrown their project into a black box with no control, they wanted to feel they were part of the process in creating the solution.
I use tools like Miro and Figjam to get all my notes on a single spread for analysis and synthesis. This also makes it easy to go back and review specific findings in the future.
I worked with another researcher to gather these same insights from the perspective of current Toptal customers. Our discoveries aligned, and we were able to present a very robust case to the Product and Growth teams, including customer needs, motivations, past experiences, expectations, preferences, and more.
Focus 2: Value Propositions Tradeoff Analysis
The Problem: One of the primary inputs the team needed was refinement of the product’s value propositions (VPs). We had a set of VPs from brainstorming, but we needed to know which ones were more or less important from the customer’s perspective, so we know how to best capture people’s attention to click our ads and sign-up for our service
Goal
Create a ranked list of the value propositions according to which were most and least important to Toptal’s customer base.
Solution
In our in-depth interviews, I included an activity which had interviewees rank and categorize the list of VPs. We used Miro to move the VPs around and make notes on why they were ranked in certain ways.
Miro board activity with participants to rank value propositions according to how important they are to them. This was cross referenced with findings from a quantitative survey on the same topic.
In parallel, I was also conducting a MaxDiff survey with 100 respondents of the same sample type (leaders and executives who have used end-to-end solution agencies for tech projects). The MaxDiff survey presents 4 VPs at a time and asks respondents to choose which one resonates with them the most, and which resonates the least. The point is asking them for a tradeoff - you can’t rank them all highly, so it forces them to think about which VPs are truly the most compelling for them. In the end, we get a list of VPs with scores according to how often they were picked as most and least compelling.
Insights from the MaxDiff survey comparing how compelling or not each value proposition was.
One of the core findings was that the VPs which the team had hypothesized might be the most compelling were actually not the most compelling to potential customers. For example, customers were much more interested in seeing credentials which they can externally verify and speak to the process that will be taken, rather than general statements about the end-point.
Analysis of the value propositions from the interviews, counting how many times each VP ended up in the “Most” or “Least” compelling buckets.
We learned even more about this while evaluating the landing page concepts, which I’ll discuss next.
Focus 3: Landing Page Concept Testing
The Problem: The team had put together a quick prototype for a landing page based on assumptions, but there were many questions about wording, content, and layout. Which heading is the most effective here? Should this content block go first or second?
Goal
Help the team make decisions about the best messages and organization of the landing page to drive intrigue and sales calls scheduled.
Solution
My readout slides focus on breaking down abstract concepts into actionable insights.
At the end of the interviews, after we had gathered participants’ unbiased opinions and perspectives on Managed Delivery services, I let them explore two variations of the landing page. These variations were crafted to test specific hypotheses about headings, messages, layout, content, etc. Participants gave us their reactions and opinions, which I used to create recommendations to optimize flow and conversion through the landing page.
Single page or slide summaries can be extremely useful for aligning teams on what we learned and what we planned to do, as well as keeping a record which is easily understandable in the future.
Impacts
The insights from this study influenced marketing, sales, and product/service strategy for Managed Delivery. We used these findings to refine overarching strategies as well as countless details within the customer experience flow. The launch of Managed Delivery was a success, drumming up large contracts with existing clients as well as with entirely new customers. You can see more about Managed Delivery here: https://www.toptal.com/managed-delivery